Wolfowitz apologizes for getting his girlfriend a job

Who's apologizing now?

Paulie Wolfowitz, for getting his girlfriend a highpaying job. And now the World Bank Group staff wants him to step down. PS, this is one mean neo-conartist and chief architect of the mess in Iraq. How he ended up at the World Bank in the first place is scandalous. We hope they get him like they got Imus!

At issue are the generous compensation and pay raises of a bank employee, Shaha Riza, who has dated Wolfowitz. She was given an assignment at the State Department in September 2005, shortly after he became bank president.

"In hindsight I wish I had trusted my original instincts and kept myself out of the negotiations," Wolfowitz said. "I made a mistake, for which I am sorry." The World Bank Group Staff Association is demanding that Wolfowitz step down.

Douglas Feith is a liar and Fox News busted him

Who's lying now?

Douglas Feith, smarmy NeoConArtist, caught on tape. You idioit. You and all the rest of the NeoConArtists have lied, lied, lied....and now EVEN FOX NEWS CHANNEL can't ignore it. DF acts the innocent - Who , me? I never said al Qaeda and Iraq were linked. Oh, yes you did. Thanks, Chris Wallace. There may be hope for you, yet.

Raw Story has it up first: "But it turns out he did make that case," says Wallace, "in a memo he sent to the Senate Intelligence Committee in October of '03." Wallace then quotes a Weekly Standard article which describes the memo as saying, "Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein had an operational relationship from the early 1990s to 2003."

A transcript of the video clip is below:

China India Russia not going to take it lying down

Take that, delusional Neoconartists....something you didn't think of, eh? That the REST of the world isn't going to stand by while GWB continues to be bamboozled by your slight of hand....

AT India, China and Russia account for 40 per cent of the world’s population, a fifth of its economy and more than half of its nuclear warheads. Now they appear to be forming a partnership to challenge the US-dominated world order that has prevailed since the end of the Cold War....Foreign ministers from the three emerging giants met in Delhi yesterday to discuss ways to build a more democratic “multipolar world”.... But their most significant common ground is opposition to US military intervention in Iran. The joint statement did not mention Iran, but the three countries have taken a common stance in calling for a negotiated solution through the International Atomic Energy Agency. None of them wants a nuclear-armed Iran, but Russia sells Tehran nuclear technology and India and China need Iranian gas.

Neo-Con(Artists) hijack American policy AGAIN

The Iraqi debacle is not the product of their (neocon) failed policies. Rather, it is the result of America's failure to think big.

Those rats. Those turncoats. Those traitors. How dare they? And how dare we let them. Bush is clearly under their spell....when is somebody going to wake the "sleeping prince" up? Is he really that stupid, or does he actually buy this horse pocky?

Do you realize that the NeoConArtists have had Iran in their sights for over 10 YEARS?!? This isn't something about WMD or Islamofascism (a term which wasn't even in vogue 10 years ago). Nope, this is the faaar right wingnut Likud party agenda:

VF On July 8, 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's newly elected prime minister and the leader of its right-wing Likud Party, paid a visit to the neoconservative luminary Richard Perle in Washington, D.C. The subject of their meeting was a policy paper that Perle and other analysts had written for an Israeli-American think tank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic Political Studies. Titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," the paper contained the kernel of a breathtakingly radical vision for a new Middle East. By waging wars against Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, the paper asserted, Israel and the U.S. could stabilize the region. Later, the neoconservatives argued that this policy could democratize the Middle East.

Grand Delusion - Robert Kagan and John Bolton

Who's totally delusional now?

Not the politicians, as Robert Kagan, Neocon Poobah, would have us believe from his op-ed piece in the WaPo yesterday. Nope, this war monger is happy to stoke the guilt flames of the politicians dumb enough to listen to him, or care about what he writes about. Remember, folks, here's the ARCHITECT of the Project for the New American Century - the flawed blueprint that got us in the mess in the middle east to begin with.

Robert Kagan is delusional. He's delusional about what war really means, and who and what America really is. He claims he's not a Straussian, but we don't agree. He lives in Belgium and ha spent a lifetime furthering the Straussian cause....he is a very dangerous man.

At least "bull in the china shop" John Bolton tells it like it is...."The US has no strategic interest in a united Iraq." No, because we're only there for the oil, oil, oil, stupid, stupid, stupid. "The United States has no strategic interest in the fact that there be one Iraq or three Iraqs," the newspaper quoted Bolton as saying. "We have a strategic interest in ensuring that what emerges is not a completely failed state that becomes a refuge for terrorists, or a terrorist state," he said.

Neo-Cons hate America

Or the Neo-Con-Artists, as we like to call them. Are they more dangerous than ever because of their stupid, ill-thought-out, clumsy, deadly blunder in Iraq? Remember, their agenda is in line with the extreme rightwing Likud party in Israel (notice, their agenda is NOT about America...).

Dear God, let's hope their war drum beat for invading Iran is drowned out by reason....or we're in for a dark period ahead....

AJ ...As Iran makes a "final step" in its nuclear program, senior government officials have stated that pre-emptive strikes may be on the table. The Iranians have repeatedly claimed that they are being threatened with force by Israel, while the Israeli ambassador has said that "US President George W. Bush will not hesitate to use force against Iran in order to halt its nuclear program,"....

As point two of James Baker's Iraq strategy will look to diplomatic cooperation with Iraq's neighbours, should Iran be seen as refusing to cooperate with the strategy, this may be used as a final excuse to impose isolation and a blockade on Iran, possibly leading to conflict.
Leading Neocons such as Richard Perle and Michael Ledeen, extremely disgruntled with the fierce criticism they have recently received over the Iraq war, are now calling for swift and decisive action.

It certainly seems that now, more than ever, we should be on guard against a wounded and dangerous Neocon leadership. The American people have shown that they do not trust them and they want rid of them. In this sense, and with "impeachment off the table", the Bush cabal has nothing left to lose.

GOP turns on the Generals in Iraq - the NeoCons turn on Bush

Looks like the mice leaving the sinking ship - or should we say RATS. Everyone's turning on everyone else. Let the finger pointing begin!

VF: Neo Culpa

As Iraq slips further into chaos, the war's neoconservative boosters have turned sharply on the Bush administration, charging that their grand designs have been undermined by White House incompetence. In a series of exclusive interviews, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman, David Frum, and others play the blame game with shocking frankness. Target No. 1: the president himself.

And this - swan song for the NeoConArtists?
...Fearing that worse is still to come, Adelman believes that neoconservatism itself—what he defines as "the idea of a tough foreign policy on behalf of morality, the idea of using our power for moral good in the world"—is dead, at least for a generation. After Iraq, he says, "it's not going to sell."

U.S. Retreating from Democracy Push

Get a clue.

Looks like the AEI NeoConArtists are being pushed into the background. Don't celebrate yetm though. Their not done...in fact, they're pushing harder than ever on attacking Korea, Iran, anyone....

What idiot allowed these true conartists to hijack the American system of government, anyway?

"Frankly, the administration has retreated even from a passive push for democracy," said Michael Rubin, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. Washington is now largely silent about actions taken by Middle East regimes to suppress political opposition....

The credibility problem is complicated by Bush's use of the democracy theme in speeches. Before the U.N. General Assembly, he portrayed the United States as a friend of freedom but cited autocratic regimes, including Saudi Arabia, as reformers. "People in the region know about the Saudi government. They're not naive," said Thomas Carothers, head of the Democracy and Rule of Law Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The perception of hypocrisy is extremely high," he said" here

NeoConArtists Warmongering on N. Korea

Who's warmongering now?

The NeoConArtists - who totally fell out of favor because Iraq is doing badly and Lebanon won. They CAN'T STAND being out of the limelight and the N. Korea saga is music to their ears. Beware the NeoConArtists!

aTimes here:
Encouraging Japan to build nuclear weapons, shipping food aid via submarines and running secret sabotage operations inside North Korea's borders are among a raft of policy prescriptions pushed by prominent US neo-conservatives in the wake of Pyongyang's reported testing of an atomic bomb. ...The neo-conservatives, whose influence on the Bush administration has generally been on the wane since late 2003 when it became clear that the Iraq war they had done so much to champion was going badly, nonetheless retain some clout, particularly through the offices of Vice President Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld.

6 in 10 Iraqis want Americans blown up

Get a clue!

This is a stunning report about how the Iraqi's really feel about the so-called help they've been getting from Americans. They want us dead. They don't want our help.

Of course, the Neoconartists and the Bushies need to ignore this. They are in Iraq for OIL. And they plan to stay in Iraq for OIL. In fact, back in August, 2006, Ken Melhman, the RNC Chairman said this on Meet The Press about why we needed to "stay the course". "...Imagine a failed state on the second largest oil reserves in the world." That's one of the most honest statements made by the GOP and just about sums it all up.

The Iraqi's know this. In fact, neo conartist Chalabi is in on it! He was named Minister of Oil in December 2005. That's why THREE-FOURTHS of the Iraqi's polled believe the US plans to keep military bases in Iraq permanently. They're right. We do.

"The poll, done for University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes, found:
_Almost four in five Iraqis say the U.S. military force in Iraq provokes more violence than it prevents.
_About 61 percent approved of the attacks — up from 47 percent in January. A solid majority of Shiite and Sunni Arabs approved of the attacks, according to the poll. The increase came mostly among Shiite Iraqis.
_An overwhelmingly negative opinion of terror chief bin Laden and more than half, 57 percent, disapproving of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
_Three-fourths say they think the U.S. plans to keep military bases in Iraq permanently.
_A majority of Iraqis, 72 percent, say they think Iraq will be one state five years from now. Shiite Iraqis were most likely to feel that way, though a majority of Sunnis and Kurds also believed that would be the case."