War Intelligence was fake

DUH. Get a clue. The "war intelligence" is really Grand Poohba NeoConArtist Richard Perle's Clean Break Strategy....written waaaay before 9-11. And - yoo hoo - Douglas Feith is one of the authors of Clean Break AND the liar intelligence.

So, of course the intel was bad, fake, a lie! It needed to match the Clean Break Strategy they have been using as a blueprint for war. PS - According to that strategy, all is going well. The purpose of Clean Break is to create CHAOS in the middle east and then reorder it with Israel on top. Iran is next in the rifle sites.

Fine. The NeoConArtists are TRAITORS to AMERICA and have bamboozled Bush. What are WE, the citizens of this country, going to do about it? Sit around and boo hoo as they march into Iran?

WaPo Intelligence provided by former undersecretary of defense Douglas J. Feith to buttress the White House case for invading Iraq included "reporting of dubious quality or reliability" that supported the political views of senior administration officials rather than the conclusions of the intelligence community, according to a report by the Pentagon's inspector general.

Feith's office "was predisposed to finding a significant relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda," according to portions of the report, released yesterday by Sen. Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.). The inspector general described Feith's activities as "an alternative intelligence assessment process." READ LIAR

Neo-Con(Artists) hijack American policy AGAIN

The Iraqi debacle is not the product of their (neocon) failed policies. Rather, it is the result of America's failure to think big.

Those rats. Those turncoats. Those traitors. How dare they? And how dare we let them. Bush is clearly under their spell....when is somebody going to wake the "sleeping prince" up? Is he really that stupid, or does he actually buy this horse pocky?

Do you realize that the NeoConArtists have had Iran in their sights for over 10 YEARS?!? This isn't something about WMD or Islamofascism (a term which wasn't even in vogue 10 years ago). Nope, this is the faaar right wingnut Likud party agenda:

VF On July 8, 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's newly elected prime minister and the leader of its right-wing Likud Party, paid a visit to the neoconservative luminary Richard Perle in Washington, D.C. The subject of their meeting was a policy paper that Perle and other analysts had written for an Israeli-American think tank, the Institute for Advanced Strategic Political Studies. Titled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," the paper contained the kernel of a breathtakingly radical vision for a new Middle East. By waging wars against Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, the paper asserted, Israel and the U.S. could stabilize the region. Later, the neoconservatives argued that this policy could democratize the Middle East.

Neo-Con-Artist's at it again - target: Iran

Who's Sorry Now?

All Americans, if ANYBODY listens to the idiot NCA on Iran. Let's all remember the lame duck Congress has two months in which to start another ill-fated military advance. They must be stopped.

Can you believe the same folks who brought you "a cakewalk" in Iraq are now touting a "walk in the park" in Iran?

Good thing the Sun Myung Moon-owned newspaper conservative Washington Times is showing these shysters for what they are....especially Richard Perle.

WT...Leading neocon Richard Perle, who led the intellectual charge for the ill-fated invasion of Iraq, believes two B-2 bombers, each with 16 independently targeted weapons systems, could punch out Iran's nuclear lights. No Air Force expert we could find agreed. But the Pentagon's Air Force generals believe it can be done -- and successfully -- with a much larger operation, including five nights of bombing, some 400 aim points, 75 requiring deep penetration ordnance. Time magazine estimates 1,500 such aim points, or "viable targets," related to Iran's widely scattered nuclear development complex. The Navy, with its carrier task forces and ship-launched cruise missiles, does not share the same degree of certainty. ...

Richard Perle disses Bush and his failed-state Iraqi war

Who's tossing the Prez aside now?

That would be head NeoCon Richard Perle. We linked to the Vanity Fair article yesterday....looks like the NCA (Neo-con-artists) are out on the press tour to call the US policy a DISASTER. Pretty harsh words for a NCA...especially one who looooovvvvveeeed Bush just a little while ago. Rats, all of 'em.

When are the American people going to wake up and realize that our country had been hijacked by the NCA's and now that it's in disarray, they're bailing and tossing the Prez to the wolves.

AP WASHINGTON - A leading conservative proponent of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq now says dysfunction within the Bush administration has turned U.S. policy there into a disaster.

Richard Perle, who chaired a committee of Pentagon policy advisers early in the Bush administration, said had he seen at the start of the war in 2003 where it would go, he probably would not have advocated an invasion to depose Saddam Hussein. Perle was an assistant secretary of defense under President Reagan.

"I probably would have said, 'Let's consider other strategies for dealing with the thing that concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists,'" he told Vanity Fair magazine in its upcoming January issue.