Showing posts with label Karl Rove. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karl Rove. Show all posts

Monday, May 14, 2007

2nd in Charge McNulty is McGone

Who's sorry now?
Oh jeez. McNulty is getting out of the line of fire of Rove? Sure sounds like it.


Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty said Monday he will resign, becoming the highest-ranking Bush administration casualty in the furor over the firing of U.S. attorneys...

The aides spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk publicly about McNulty's decision. McNulty also irked Gonzales by testifying in February that at least one of the fired prosecutors was ordered to make way for a protege of Karl Rove, President Bush's chief political adviser. Gonzales, who has resisted lawmakers' calls to resign, maintains the firings were proper, and rooted in the prosecurtors' lackluster performances.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Friday, February 9, 2007

Rove's a Hypocrite on Immigratrion

We happen to agree with him....but that's not the point. The point is that what he was overheard saying is yet another slap in the face to those who believe in the GOP and everything it stands for:
Not Our Kind of People [Mark Krikorian]

NRO According to a congressman's wife who attended a Republican women's luncheon yesterday, Karl Rove explained the rationale behind the president's amnesty/open-borders proposal this way: "I don't want my 17-year-old son to have to pick tomatoes or make beds in Las Vegas."

There should be no need to explain why this is an obscene statement coming from a leader in the party that promotes the virtues of hard work, thrift, and sobriety, a party whose demi-god actually split fence rails as a young man, a party where "respectable Republican cloth coat" once actually meant something. But it does seem to be necessary to explain.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Will Rove testify at the Libby trial?

Who's been subpoenaed now?

That would be Karl Rove, chief troublemaker, and Dan Bartlett, chief spinmeister. Ha! And for the defense! What fun.

Michael Isikoff, Newsweek Jan. 26, 2007 - White House anxiety is mounting over the prospect that top officials—including deputy chief of staff Karl Rove and counselor Dan Bartlett-may be forced to provide potentially awkward testimony in the perjury and obstruction trial of Lewis (Scooter) Libby.

Sunday, December 10, 2006

Rove loses his luster;door hits Frist on the way out

Who's sorry now?

Jeez. Don't cross the Bushies. Apparently, they can turn on you in a dime. Look at what's happening to both "golden boys" of the GOP: Rove and Frist.

Rove here USN It's an ugly rumor, but it's spreading like wildfire: Karl Rove has lost his touch. In an amazing betrayal within a family where top political aide Rove is royalty, Bushies have been sneering at his pre-election happy talk that the gop would keep the Senate and take a slight hit in the House, both soon to be run by Democrats. And now we learn that President Bush really believed the GOP was safe, too. On the day before the elections, he asked embattled House gop leader Dennis Hastert to run for speaker again so he could guide the White House's agenda in Congress.

Frist here DFW Some Republicans heaped scorn on Frist, faulting him for fostering runaway federal spending. Late Friday night, House Appropriations Chairman Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., said icily in a speech on the House floor that Congress' failure to pass nine of 11 appropriations bills "should be placed squarely at the feet of the departing [Senate] majority leader." The House passed its version of the bills, but the Senate did not.


Saturday, November 11, 2006

Did Bush and Rove produce an INTENTIONAL flop?

Verrrrrry interesting. The premise of this from Attytood is that a Democratic Congress is more favorable to Bush for his final two years than a Republican one....hmmmmmmm....could it be true?

.....Maybe it's just because the Democrats actually won something, but for the last few days, something has just not felt quite right about either Tuesday's election, or the White House's handling of the voting and the aftermath. We have no doubts that a majority of American voters wanted change on Election Day, and they wanted the Democrats to be the agent of that change.

But we've also followed politics -- and the rise of George W. Bush and Karl Rove -- intensely these past six or seven years, and so beginning on Tuesday night, we were increasingly surprised at all the dogs that did not bark in the 2006 election -- dogs that raised quite a ruckus in the last three national elections......

Is Karl Rove even more of an evil genuis than we think? Did he and Bush just produce an election flop...on purpose?

It sounds completely off-the-wall, and before this post is over we'll give some good reasons why they wouldn't do that. But we'll also give you a couple of good reasons why life could be better for the Bush White House and the future presidential ambitions of the GOP with the Dems running Congress.


Karl Rove is clearly clueless

Who's still not getting it now?

That would be Karl Rove et al (including GAY K. Mehlman - who'll be stepping down). Articles and quotes like these are proof that the GOP just didn't get it. Corruption matters....mostly because of the hypocracy apparent in the "holier-than-thou" GOP walking all over American citizens in their apparent contempt for the little guy.

What? They thought we weren't paying attention? Rats, all of them. Oh, and that famous "get out the vote" machine? They got out and voted, all right, but for DEMS. Ha!

Mike Allen/Time: ..."The profile of corruption in the exit polls was bigger than I'd expected," Rove tells TIME. "Abramoff, lobbying, Foley and Haggard [the disgraced evangelical leader] added to the general distaste that people have for all things Washington, and it just reached critical mass."...Rove is an enthusiastic historian, but even he has trouble coming up with a parallel for this wild week. "We may look back and see this as a unique expression," he said. Republicans can only hope.

Friday, October 27, 2006

Could the Corker Ad Win Votes for FORD?


Who's (may be) sorry now?
Karl Rove, the entire GOP, and most GOP candidates.
Why? Because Rove has groomed a protege who's just proven he has the right stuff, which could turn into the wrong stuff.

That Corker/Ford ad with the white "hooker" asking Harold Ford to call her? Produced by Rove's clone, Scott Howell. What do you think of the ad? Is it working? Will Corker win? Or does it kind of make Ford look like a "player" in a good way? We know the GOP and righties are absolutely obsessed with sex....maybe GOP voters will secretly vote for Harold because they.... admire him? Hmmmmmm??????

(CBS/AP) A protégé of White House political guru Karl Rove produced the controversial Republican National Committee ad targeting Tennessee Democratic Senate candidate Rep. Harold Ford Jr., that some have called racist, CBS News has learned. The ad, in which a white woman with blonde hair and bare shoulders looks into the camera and whispers, "Harold, call me," and then winks, was produced by Scott Howell, the former political director for Rove's consulting firm in Texas.

Friday, October 13, 2006

Rove's October Surprise

Get a clue.

Remember, the GOP plays for keeps. There is an October surprise out there that Karl Rove has cooked up and is waiting for the right time to toss it out there. Something big enough to completely shut down talk about Foley, scandals, spying, gays in the GOP, Hastert's coverup, Korea, 9-11, security, borders, etc.

Catch Bin Laden? Attack Iran? Bring home troops? Something is fixin' to happen [ what do you think it will be?

Saturday, October 7, 2006

Rove's Deputy Resigns

Who's resigning now?

Susan Ralston, Karl Rove's Deputy. Why? Enter our favorite gangsta, Jack Abramoff. The guy is singing like a canary and takin' 'em down, one by one. Susan is the lastest, after Bob Ney. The Jackster is the gift that keeps on giving. And Susan is the latest victim of Digital DNA....never forget - your digital fingerprints are everywhere! It was the emails that did it...

"For Karl Rove's deputy to resign so close to a historic election is a shocker of the first order in official Washington, leaving the strong suggestion that more news is imminent on Ms. Ralston's situation. While it would not be fair to her to draw conclusions at this point, to resign at this critical moment is virtually unprecedented in this or other Administrations, and strongly suggests the coming days will bring new revelations." here

and here:

Ralston, who earned $122,000 a year, had been a minor player in the scandal for more than a year, but it was not until her e-mails with the lobbyist were released by the House Government Reform Committee last week that her role became known.

The information supplied by Ralston to Abramoff often involved procedural matters, social events and possible administration appointments, the committee said.

Ralston was the latest victim of the Abramoff scandal. One Republican lawmaker, Ohio Rep. Bob Ney (news, bio, voting record), and several former Republican aides have so far pleaded guilty in the corruption probe.


Tuesday, October 3, 2006

Should Speaker Hastert Resign?


Get a clue.

A reader heard Denny Hastert on the Hannity radio show today saying he "didn't really understand this IM technology, anyway." Jeez. And these guys are in charge. This is right up there with "the Internet is a series of tubes...".

Supposedly, he's fighting for his job. Not so fast. Remember, a good "regime change" invasion-wag-the-dog bombing of Iran wipes all this off the news. And Woodward too.

Karl Rove plays to win. His only job right now is to win the midterms. He is not going to let this wimp, Mark Foley, or Hastert ruin that. Plus, the neo conartists are itching to implement the "New American way of war" (ala Max Boot's thesis).

Attack Iran - the REAL October Surprise

This is a doomsday worldveiw, but not one that Karl Rove and the Neo-conartists wouldn't just LOVE to implement. Be concerned, be very concerned. This is the REAL October surprise. Especially as the drumbeat increases on the Foley scandal, etc. Attack on Iran is moving to the front burner.

Here "If the fallout from the Foley scandal makes it appear inevitable that the Democrats will take the House, the Iran card may be the surest one, and perhaps the only one, that the Bush administration has left to play. I am certain that the sons of bitches who call the shots in the administration have no intention of letting some annoying, whining pipsqueaks (as they undoubtedly view them) peer over their shoulders during the last two years of their reign, as they attempt to ensure American and Republican domination of this country and the world for the foreseeable future.In the hysteria that would follow an attack on Iran, and in the ensuing, spreading carnage, enough people may well rally to the support of the administration to prevent the Democrats from making the required gains."